Guy Verhofstadt Fails The Trade Module In Economics – It’s About Imports You Idiot

Guy Verhofstadt has decided to take time out from politicking to be a President of Europe to teach us all about the merits of free trade agreements. In which he entirely and absolutely fails the trade module of his Economics 101 course. Sure, par for the course for a federast but still, amusing that he parades his ignorance in the national press.

The error is this:

The real global trading power, of course, is the EU, which has recently concluded trade deals with Japan, South Korea and Canada. As an EU member state, the UK automatically benefits from the 40 trade agreements the bloc has in place with more than 70 countries. If the UK opts for a “hard” Brexit and leaves without a deal, as Johnson has indicated he is willing to do, it would immediately lose preferential access to markets that account for around 11% of its total trade.

Trade isn’t about access to other peoples’ markets. It’s about what we let into our own.

Moreover, the EU is finalising negotiations for a new free-trade agreement with the Mercosur bloc – Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay – as part of a broader association agreement between the two regions. That will cement the EU’s position as the global leader of open trade. Though European companies already export a great deal to Mercosur – €42bn in goods in 2016; €22bn in services in 2015 – tariff barriers are currently high. European exporters face levies of 35% on cars, 20-35% on machinery and related components, and 14% on pharmaceuticals.

What other people charge themselves on our exports doesn’t matter a toss to us. What does make a difference is what we charge ourselves for the temerity of buying off Johnny Foreigner.

Just to repeat for the hard of understanding – or federasts but I repeat myself – the aim, point and purpose of trade is access to the imports. Those things that J Foreigner does better, cheaper, fancier or faster than we do. Exports are just the effort that we put in to gain access to them. The only logical stance to have upon trade is therefore unilateral free trade. This is not what the European Union does nor what anyone in power within it believes. Therefore we’re better off out so that we can ourselves adopt this only logical stance.

At which point, Mr. Verhofstadt, stuff that in your Mannekin Pis and leave us alone to be sensible.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Andrew CareyQ46Nick BurtonLeo Savantt Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Leo Savantt
Guest
Leo Savantt

Verhofstadt is an odd character, having had dealings with him the kindest thing that can be said is “don’t let this man babysit your child”.

In his mind everything the EU does is by definition beneficial because the EU did it. That makes him a very dangerous politician, the archetypal intelligent fool’s fanatasism is to be feared. That he does not understand economics is no surprise.

Nick Burton
Guest
Nick Burton

If the EU is such a beacon of free trade, why are they threatening the UK with trade barriers and tariffs….?

Q46
Guest
Q46

Free trade means each party to the trade is unencumbered by terms and conditions imposed by third parties, particularly Government.

Therefore free trade ‘agreement’ is an oxymoron. If it is free trade, there is no agreement, and if there is an agreement it is not free trade.

Andrew Carey
Guest
Andrew Carey

Those things that J Foreigner does better, cheaper, fancier or faster than we do. The English language is a quality one, and that sort of ranty sentence shows why.