They’re Spouting Drivel Again Over British Food After Brexit

One more part of Project Fear is this insistence that our current trade arrangements are the only arrangements possible. Even, that without Nanny EU to hold our hand we’ll be unable to import things. Which is really rather odd as the European Union limits what we may import and from where. It doesn’t allow it, doesn’t encourage it, it prevents it. So quite how not being limited by the EU will mean less food for us is, well, it’s difficult to understand, isn’t it? Unless they’re all just deliberately lying to us.

Here’s What British People Would Eat in a Worst-Case Brexit
If trade routes really were to shut down, a hypothetical U.K. diet would leave a lot to be desired.

It’s not true that there’s even a connection between those two lines. By worst case here they mean no deal. OK, fine, that means that we’ve not got deals with other countries as to the terms under which they’ll allow our exports to become imports into their countries. Well, no terms other than WTO ones, the way some vast amount of international trade is already carried on.

OK.

What’s that got to do with the rules we apply to things we want to import? Those rules are – once we leave for the EU currently claims sole competence here – whatever we want them to be. We can indeed have the no rules stuff we did in 1846 when we abolished the Corn Laws. Given that the abolition made us all very much richer we should too. But it does need to be said yet again that this is up to us. We get to decide this, not them:

No more avocado toast or banana smoothies, and forget about shaving fresh Parmesan on your pasta. Instead, get used to milk at every meal, bread for days, lamb chops, and peas. Lots and lots of peas. Home-grown meals more akin to an industrial-age diet are what Britons could be eating if the U.K. leaves the European Union without a deal that sets up basic trading relations with other countries. The U.K. relies heavily on imports and has been such a hotbed of agricultural trade for centuries that it’s easy to forget what the British palate would look like in a world where food trade grinds to a halt.

But there’s no reason why a no deal exit should mean we can’t import whatever food we want. As above, in fact, given that we’ll be free of the EU restrictions on what we may import from where and whom we’ll be even more open to the tasty glories of the world’s farms.

There’d be fewer greens, and what remains will be more vulnerable to seasonal harvests. Fresh produce would be among the most affected, as the U.K. imports most of its fruit and about half its vegetables. We’d each get about four pounds of strawberries and half a pound of raspberries a year from British farms, with nary a banana. Avocado toast is off the menu, too. The country produces plenty of peas (its best-selling veggie), and carrots and beets are available most months. Broccoli would be on the shelves for just half the year. Save the tomatoes for special occasions: U.K. farmers produce only a fifth of the tomatoes sold in the country throughout the year, and up to a half in the summer, according to the British Tomato Grower’s Association.

Still, there is one advantage to this screed. Think on what the Greens keep telling us. We should eat only local food. All this international trade in the stuff is very bad indeed.

That’s what the British diet would look like if they got their way, isn’t it?

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
DavidsbRhoda KlappthammondQuentin Volestarfish Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Rhoda Klapp
Guest
Rhoda Klapp

Remember when submarines and aircraft from one now-EU country based in another were not able to stop us getting food? Surely that article is a pisstake of project fear?

starfish
Guest
starfish

I think all this media nonsense has slipped from fear-mongering into parody

Its not serious is it?

Quentin Vole
Guest
Quentin Vole

I actually don’t think the Bloomberg article was meant to be taken seriously – as Rhoda says, it’s a parody of Project Fear; either that or an extreme projection of not just the worst imaginable case, but the worst case that doesn’t directly contravene the laws of physics. If I’m mistaken, then the writer has lost contact with reality.

Rhoda Klapp
Guest
Rhoda Klapp

I’m inclined to think this is one of those journalist competitions, to see who can get the daftest brexit story published. And taken seriously.

I was warhcing one of Scott Adams’ podcasts in which he introduced the term loserthink. That concept explains how intelligent people can believe the most daft doom-laden agendas.

thammond
Guest
thammond

I think it has been taken seriously though. There’s no actual serious economic or trade forecasts that justify so many MPs talking about No Deal Armageddon, yet they seem to actually believe it will happen.

literate3
Guest
literate3

How many people starved to death during WW2? Millions. How many people in the UK starved to death during WW2? approximately zero.
We can grow our own strawberries and raspberries – my Dad used to grow so many raspberries in our back garden that we couldn’t eat them all so he made jam with the surplus.

thammond
Guest
thammond

The medicines scares amuse me more. We import £10 billion of illegal drugs each year despite our best efforts to stop them, but come Brexit we will be unable to import legal drugs! Just make insulin illegal and there wil lbe plenty of it around! Probably cheaper too.

Davidsb
Guest
Davidsb

I can almost hear the avocado-growers of Israel, South Africa, etc., salivating at the thought of free access to the millions of British tables which will undoubtedly, come 29th March, suddenly become avocado-free zones…..