The Swansea Tidal Power Project Is A Total And Complete Dog

4
66

Yes, yes, yes, we’re all supposed to be right on about renewables. Even, willing to fund them through the loss making development phase and get to scale. Not that that should be done by either taxpayers or consumers, that’s what capitalists are for. But even if we accept all those points about how luvverly it will be to have non-fossil fuel energy sources the Swansea tidal power project is still a complete and total dog.

Simply because there are other, cheaper, methods of gaining that same energy generation capacity.

This being what market prices actually do for us. There are millions of things that can be done to reduce emissions. In fact, if each inhabitant simply took one less car ride a year that would be 65 million things, wouldn’t it? Or perhaps people will, over time, move to be closer to work thus reducing commutes. Or work from home. Or recycle more steel meaning less coke used to make the virgin stuff. Or CFCs will be captured from old equipment more efficiently. Or….well, you get the picture.

Even within energy generation there are myriad options. More solar, land based wind, hydrogen, nuclear, maybe some bugger can make carbon capture work, what about algal fuels and on, on and again on?

How do we sort through these possibilities? Well, that’s actually what markets and their prices do for us. As Hayek pointed out that market, that entire economy, is the only calculating engine we’ve got to crunch through such complex points.

So, what do we need to know about Swansea then? We need to know the price. What’s needed as the price of their electricity output in order to make it sensible to build the thing?

The company clinched permission to develop the ambitious tidal lagoon project in 2015 but last summer ministers rejected its calls for a subsidy contract which would cost energy bill payers three times as much per unit of electricity as new nuclear power.

It’s a dog, forget it.

There, that was easy, wasn’t it?

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
4 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Quentin VoleMichael van der RietGavin LongmuirLeo Savantt Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Leo Savantt
Guest
Leo Savantt

Get fracking, maybe there is loads of untapped energy, maybe there isn’t; let’s find out before hugely expensive and environmentally dubious projects like Swansea cost us an arm and a leg, either via subsidy or high energy prices. The capitalists are willing to frack, sadly Boris is not.

Gavin Longmuir
Guest
Gavin Longmuir

Strange thing is that so-called environmentalists can’t seem to grasp the point that interfering with the ecologically-important tidal zone is going to have significant impacts on the environment. And none of the Political Class seem to recognize that intermittent tidal power is no use to the punter in Swansea trying to get his laundry done. Sadly, safe large-scale energy storage does not exist — and is not even on the horizon.

Unless a person is in favor of nuclear power, she does not take Anthropogenic Global Warming seriously.

Quentin Vole
Guest
Quentin Vole

And wind turbines kill many large birds, bats etc. Everything in life is a trade-off, unless you’re a zealot.

Michael van der Riet
Guest
Michael van der Riet

Talking about luvverly, would it not be if links in articles were in a different colour so that they can be indentified and clicked on.