The N Word Row – Clearly This PhD Student Shouldn’t Be At Cambridge

The reason to be at university is that one is uneducated and wish to become more educated. The very presence at an institution of learning is a pure and complete admission that more learning needs to take place.

That is, students, by definition, do not know everything. By the students’ own definition that is, by their very placing of themselves in the position of being students.

However, there are things that must already be known in order for such a presence, such a status as a student, to be successful. At Islington Technical College it is not to believe a single word an economic lecturer utters, including the words and and the. At Cambridge the necessary pre-knowledge is rather more specialist.

Which brings us to the N word row:

Cambridge University has been accused of racism for allowing a non-black lecturer to read aloud the N-word from a passage in class, as a PhD student quits in protest.

This is drivel. We are now to say that only black lecturers can teach about Conrad? The Nigger of the Narcissus does indeed sound a little odd, even offensive, to modern ears. It’s still a novel from one of the great writers in our language:

Gary Dexter investigates The Nigger of the Narcissus by Joseph Conrad The Nigger of the Narcissus (1897) was Conrad’s first major novel and, as an early work, its title has some peculiarities. For a start, the Narcissus was the only real ship’s name Conrad ever used in his novels and is one intimately connected with his own life: he joined the real Narcissus in Bombay in April 1864 and voyaged south past the Cape of Good Hope, reaching Dunkirk on 16 October.

A second biographical link, as Conrad told his biographer, was that the ‘Nigger’ of the title, the West Indian crewman Jimmy Wait, was based on a shipmate on that voyage, the 35-year old Joseph Barron, who, like Wait, died during the voyage. The title is obviously problematic to modern ears – Chinua Achebe charged Conrad with out-and-out racism – and was thought so in America on publication, where it was changed to The Children of the Sea: A Tale of the Forecastle.

Only black lecturers can even discuss the name of the novel and how it was changed across British and American sensibilities of the time?

That is, of course, a position of the most complete and utter tosh.

As would be, say, insisting that only a black lecturer can discuss the use of the N word in Huckleberry Finn. As PJ O’Rourke pointed out, the entire point of the story is that Huck knows, without a doubt, that his soul will be damned to all eternity if he helps the runaway slave. But he helps him anyway, in spite of that damage to his longer term prospects. It’s a story of one of those grand victories of common humanity over and above the spite and vileness of societal rules and indoctrination.

People who don’t get this may be fine on a grievance studies course at Islington Tech but they’re clearly too damn stupid to be at Cambridge.

But this isn’t quite why this PhD student shouldn’t be there.

She said she has witnessed an “accumulation” of racist incidents during her time at the university, and went on to describe an incident where an English lecturer “repeatedly read aloud the n-word during our class discussions”. Ms Seresin said that a black friend had emailed the lecturer to explain that she did not feel comfortable hearing non-black lecturers saying this word aloud. But she told how rather than receiving an apology, the friend was “patronisingly told that she did not understand the context in which the word was being used”.

Ms Seresin explains that the disagreement escalated and a group of students, including herself, had “multiple meetings” with the chair of the English faculty about it. They were also invited to raise the issue at the Teaching Forum, where academics and students meet to exchange views. Ms Seresin and her peers found the experience of speaking in front of senior faculty members “intimidating”, adding that they felt as though they were on trial.

“Many of those present seemed simply unable to comprehend the difference between a black writer reclaiming the n-word and a nonblack Cambridge lecturer or student saying it aloud in class,” she said. “We also faced hostility regarding the idea that different rules applied to black and nonblack lecturers, even though beyond Cambridge this is a widely accepted principle and for obvious reasons does not constitute a double standard.”

The point of your being at Cambridge, rather than some other lesser institution, is that you’re considered bright enough to be able to question widely accepted principles. Even, to be able to reach, critique, justify or reject them by working from first principles upwards. And if you can’t then you shouldn’t be there.

It’s not a place to regurgitate pap, no matter how fashionable it may be.

Thus good riddance. And at least we taxpayers save a bit on not having to fund such a course wasted upon one clearly not suited. At least not any more we don’t while we can mourn that the selection process failed so miserably in the first place:

…leave Cambridge where she had been working on a Government funded doctorate about contemporary American artists and writers.

Actually, why are we funding such in the first place? What is the public good – in its correct economic sense – in having any more unemployables around?

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
JdLMatt Ryanliterate3Dodgy GeezerPhoenix44 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
The Mole
Guest
The Mole

“widely accepted principle and for obvious reasons does not constitute a double standard”
I saw this yesterday and am still at a loss as to what the obvious reasons are?

Phoenix44
Guest
Phoenix44

Because this person holds that opinion. That’s enough in her own eyes to make her a genius and if she is a genius then it’s obvious she is right.

Matt Ryan
Guest
Matt Ryan

You are so unwoke.

literate3
Guest
literate3

“We hold these truths to be self-evident” means that we cannot produce any excuse that will stand up to questioning by someone with the IQ of my pet cat.

Matt Ryan
Guest
Matt Ryan

Compo claim inbound?

Dodgy Geezer
Guest
Dodgy Geezer

If you study literature as a window onto the attitudes of a society, you will find that the word ‘nigger’ has been used in a wide range of contexts over the last 100 or so years. It has been used in a purely descriptive sense, as in ‘That Frenchman over there..”, or “The French feel that…”, with no hint of insult whatsoever. Similarly, it may often be found used in a casually prejudicial way – “Damn Frogs beat us at football..” for instance. This is almost always the usage found in books from the 1700s to about the 1900s With… Read more »

Bloke in North Dorset
Guest
Bloke in North Dorset

Gary Dexter investigates The Nigger of the Narcissus by Joseph Conrad The Nigger of the Narcissus (1897) was Conrad’s first major novel

doctorate about contemporary American artists and writers

Why does 1897 classify as contemporary, its 122 years ago so hardly modern:

Definition of contemporary (Entry 1 of 2)
1a : marked by characteristics of the present period : MODERN, CURRENT
contemporary American literature
contemporary standards
b : SIMULTANEOUS
2 : happening, existing, living, or coming into being during the same period of time
The book is based on contemporary accounts of the war.

JdL
Guest
JdL

What I want to know is, if the N-word can be used by blacks but not whites, what word(s) are whites allowed to use but blacks aren’t? Surely fairness demands reciprocity.