Fatal Chico Fentanyl Overdose – Legalise Drugs Now

It could be considered more than a little perverse to greet the news of a fentanyl overdose event in Chico with a demand that drugs should now be legalised. But it is actually logical to do so. For what has killed here is the dosage of the drug and dosage is the very thing that full legalisation would cure. People are not deliberately trying to kills themselves by taking opioids, they’re being killed by not knowing how much of which opioid they are taking.

Thus legalisation and yes,this does mean full legalisation. Legal companies being able to manufacture package, brand, and yes even market, opiods like heroin and fentanyl:

One person is dead and four are in critical condition after apparent drug overdoses Saturday morning in an incident that Chico police Chief Mike O’Brien described as “horrific.” “Every indication is that this mass overdose incident was caused from the ingestion of some form of fentanyl in combination with another substance,” O’Brien said at a press conference Saturday afternoon. “That is yet to be confirmed but we do anticipate confirmation in the coming days.”

Opiods, opiates, are not all that dangerous in and of themselves as long as dosage is known. People taking clean stuff might well be doped for decades but they’re also just fine for decades. What harms health is the rubbish that they’re often cut with. What kills is the variability of the does. Fentanyl compounds this problem for it’s very much more powerful than heroin. It also has a much smaller gap between the dose that produces a high and the dose that does in fact kill.

So, these days there’s a lot of fentanyl around, it’s very cheap as a result. It’s often enough used to dope what people think is heroin. That being a problem – for how much fentanyl is in there? Enough for a high? Enough to kill? As incidents like this tell us, often enough it’s enough to kill. And this is a problem that will persist while such drugs are illegal.

For no one can or will be producing packets of the drugs with known dosages. Each injection thus becomes a crap shoot. And thus people die. Now, if it were possible to set up a legal company, which legally processed, packaged and marketed, then we’d know the dosage. And the overdose rate would plummet. Obviously, there’d be less rat poison and brick dust in the stuff which would reduce health problems. But known dosages would pretty much kill off the overdose problem.

So, yes, it is correct to meet a story of fentanyl overdose with a call for the legalisation of all drugs. Because legalisation would reduce the harm done. After all, the overdose rate on stolen pharmaceutical fentanyl and heroin is very much lower than that on the illegally blended stuff, isn’t it?

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
ShadeburstRhoda KlappJonathan HarstonMatt Ryan Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jonathan Harston
Guest
Jonathan Harston

Marketing? I tend to think it would end up like ciggies, legal, labelled, and consistant, but with marketing close to banned.

Rhoda Klapp
Guest
Rhoda Klapp

So, should government control dangerous drugs or not? Not recreational, any drugs. I need a scrip for all the drugs I take, drugs nobody would take for fun if they didn’t need them. The government has justification for restricting and controlling them. Why do the same arguments not apply to fentanyl?

Matt Ryan
Guest
Matt Ryan

Ha, and what would the prodnose’s do when they haven’t got a war on drugs?

They’d need to pick something just as stupid – like banning large meals for example (oh, wait).

Shadeburst
Guest
Shadeburst

If junkies overdose and kill themselves, so what? More oxygen for those who deserve it.