Categories: Economy

IMF’s Lagarde Entirely Wrong About Corporate Profits Taxation

That we might want to alter the system of corporate profits taxation is fair enough. But if we’re going to do that then we really need to be getting the underlying economics right. Corporate profits tax isn’t a method of taxing a company – there’s no there there. Taxes are paid, in the end, by the wallet of some live human being getting lighter. The study of whose is the study of tax incidence. A company is simply a collection of people, the taxation burden will lie on some collection of people inside and outside the company.

It’s also true that we like capital being employed to go do things. For we like the results of things being done, we get to consume those results. We’d prefer not to be taxing the returns to capital in order that we get more capital being employed. Thus we get the standard prescription, that returns to capital should not be taxed so as to make that future richer than it would be if those returns were taxed.

That’s obviously not going to work politically and it doesn’t quite work in economics either. For there are those who make monopoly profits. Or even just “excess profits”. These are those that don’t come from the normal economy boosting deployment of capital but from some special position, possibly legal privilege, within the economy. Thus we reach the Sir James Mirrlees position – and he did get his Nobel for his study of tax systems – that we should not tax normal profits but we should tax super-, excess- or monopoly profits.

Christine Lagarde of the IMF gets this entirely wrong:

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]Second, to create a system that fully taxes routine profits — something like a normal return on investment —[/perfectpullquote]

No, that’s not what we want at all. We want routine profits, that normal return on investment, to be untaxed entirely. It’s is only those excess profits which should be taxed at all.

All of which is a good description of why the world’s such an appallingly run place. Those doing the running don’t understand the basics of how it should be run.

Kidde 7COC Carbon Monoxide Alarm (replaceable batteries) 10 Year Sensor and Warranty

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Tim Worstall

View Comments

  • It's more fundamental than that. They don't understand that the economy is more akin to the weather than a machine, they are trying to "run" the weather. The best thing they could do is take their hands out of the till and do nothing. They need to be helping ensure that everybody has access to an umberalla, not trying to stop it raining.

Share
Published by
Tim Worstall

Recent Posts

The BBC and terrorism

The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…

7 months ago

We Should Pay Medical Personnel For Each Procedure They Perform

It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…

11 months ago

The Scrubbers Are Failing

In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…

1 year ago

Wondering whether an idea is actually correct or not

There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…

2 years ago

Is Cryptocurrency Our Revolution, Or Theirs?

When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…

2 years ago

Playing The Mischief With Us

As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…

2 years ago