It’s possible for people to have a monomania and then fit everything into that world view, of course it is. There’s no explanation for Marxism other than that. But it’s rare to see such mistakes – other than that Marxism of course – being taken seriously.
Here’s one of those rare examples from The Observer:
[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]On Friday Lyft, the ridesharing company, went public on the US stock markets, soaring 21% before ending the day up a more modest 8.7%. The company is now valued at $22bn, creating many new millionaires among the Lyft staff and generating big profits for investors who have backed the business as it has developed.[/perfectpullquote]OK, yes. Lyft just had their IPO. But:
[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] Douglas Rushkoff, author of Team Human and Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus, sees close parallels to the first wave of tech companies to go to public at the turn of the millennium. “What we are looking at is the reaction of traditional corporate capitalism against the sharing economy,” said Rushkoff. Just as Amazon became the online retailer and Facebook came to dominate social media, “couch-surfing became Airbnb, ridesharing became Uber. It’s capital coming in, establishing monopolies and changing the laws in order to establish a monopolistic foothold,” he said. With all this initial public offering (IPO) cash, competition will once again be killed, he warns. [/perfectpullquote]The IPO of Lyft, the ride sharing company, shows that Uber, the ride sharing company, is a monopoly? Or Lyft, the ride sharing company, raises capital meaning that this will establish Uber, the ride sharing company, as a monopolist?
Or just that Douggie here is a monomaniac insistent on forcing everything into his mania?
The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…
It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…
In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…
There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…
When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…
As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…
View Comments
> The company is now valued at
> $22bn, creating many new
> millionaires among the Lyft staff
uhm, no.
if you owned stock pre ipo, it is highly unlikely that you became a millionaire BECAUSE of the ipo
if you owned EXACTLY between $920k to $999k pre ipo, then an 8.7% post ipo rally made you a millionaire (920k x 1.087 = 1,000,040).
any other number, and you were either already a millionaire, or are not yet a millionaire
the point being that owning stock pre ipo is exactly like owning the stock post ipo.
the stock you own pre ipo may be il-liquid , but its not "fake" money that only becomes "real" money upon the ipo.
this isnt "fancy financial math", it's barely arithmetic
... and you would think that, (while they might not be good at math), journalists would understand basic arithmetic.