Deprecated: Optional parameter $output declared before required parameter $atts is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/daabdfcs/continentaltelegraph.com/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/legacy/common/wp_booster/td_wp_booster_functions.php on line 1570

Deprecated: Optional parameter $depth declared before required parameter $output is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/daabdfcs/continentaltelegraph.com/wp-content/plugins/td-cloud-library/includes/tdb_menu.php on line 251
It's Absurd To Claim Brexit Will Create A 4 Year 13 Mile Dover Lorry Jam - Continental Telegraph
Categories: Brexit

It’s Absurd To Claim Brexit Will Create A 4 Year 13 Mile Dover Lorry Jam

It is of course a great sport to be able to spot the more absurd claims being made about how Brexit will destroy everything that is lovely about our green and pleasant land. It’s less lovely to contemplate that those making the claims are either stupid enough to believe the claims or think we’re that stupid. It’s thus worth examining this latest nonsense:

By Faisal Islam, political editor

The government’s “temporary solution” to potential traffic chaos on Kent’s roads after Brexit will have to last “many years” as a permanent solution will not be in place until “2023 at the earliest”, Sky News can reveal.

According to internal Brexit impact reports from two Conservative-run local councils, the conversion of four lanes of the M20 motorway into a 13-mile (20km) long lorry park could be in place for a number of years after the UK’s departure from the EU.

The first preparations for the scheme, known as Operation Brock, have just begun, with hard shoulders about to be strengthened to sustain the weight of hundreds of parked articulated lorries.

Such a scenario is anticipated should either the Channel Tunnel or cross-Channel ferry routes see new customs or regulatory checks after Brexit.

Perhaps our first task here is to contemplate the intellect of Faisal Islam. Not great would be that first estimation.

To understand why think like you’re the bloke who makes the stuff that goes on the lorries that go to Dover. Sure, it started out, when we were bosom buddies in the EU, with the lorry leaving the factory and being in France that evening. Great, eh?

Now we’ve done the Brexit dirty deed, full customs controls are now in place in France and it takes 2 weeks to get that lorry over the Channel. Our lad goes and twiddles his thumbs at our expense in that lorry park waiting for space on a ferry.

Except, of course, he doesn’t. Because I’m the bloke making the stuff that goes on the lorry and I’m not stupid enough to send it over to France if there’s a 2 week delay, am I?

So, what will actually happen? Start from the beginning, the ferry and Tunnel capacity is going to be exactly the same as it is today. Brexit is not going to mean blowing up the ships themselves now, is it? OK, so there’s situation normal in France with the Frogs making life difficult. That means long delays for any specific lorry passing through customs. But what happens to that tail of lorries waiting to approach customs?

Well, given that not everyone actually is an idiot they don’t exist, do they? The news of that 13 mile tailback in week one has got around. Lorries and or containers now go via Harwich, Grimsby, Felixstowe, Newhaven. Business doesn’t happen at all perhaps. But there’s just no manner at all in which we’re going to have a permanent 13 mile tailback. To think so is to be grievously in error. Traffic flow to Dover will vary given the difficulty or not of getting through Dover, obviously enough. It is only variability in that difficulty which is going to cause jams, the standard flow and throughput will adapt to whatever the constant difficulties are.

Or as we might put it, a 13 mile tailback raises the price of going through Dover so fewer people will do it, thus eliminating the tailback.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Tim Worstall

View Comments

  • Which makes you wonder, does Faisal believe this crap, or does he merely believe WE will believe it? Either explanation makes him stupid.

  • To which I might add that there is a finite number of lorries. The slower they go the slower they complete the round trip. So even if none of the trade diverts (seriously unlikely as you say) expect both the owners and the drivers of the lorries to organise parking in a more convenient location- like back at the depot.

  • Recipe: Note that everything is changing; assume that such factors as you invent will be totally unchanged; illustrate the resulting chaos. Oh, yes, and also assume that neither bureaucrats nor the British public have a problem with the M20 being turned into a lorry park and demand solutions.

    Were there a logjam at the border, how does the UK-minus-EU lose its historical expertise both at queue management and at persuading all that cooperating with the management is in their own best interest?

    Brexit does demand that a new task be performed, incoming inspection, as we no longer trust France (or maybe we do). But it also provides a multitude of tasks that do not need to be performed, namely, people standing on their heads to comply with EU diktats.

  • Are there kilometre long tailbacks at the Swiss-French border?

    If such a thing were to happen it would be French customers and businesses that suffered, not British ones. France doesn't want that.

    These people need to see a Customs Agent and get pre-clearance and expedited clearance explained to them.

  • Are there kilometre long tailbacks at the Swiss-French border?

    If such a thing were to happen it would be French customers and businesses that suffered, not British ones. France doesn't want that.

    These people need to see a Customs Agent and get pre-clearance and expedited clearance explained to them.

  • Maybe the next post will be that the ferry companies and tunnel are going to be in trouble because of reduced volume as it’s now so difficult to cross

  • In short, however bad the problems, it makes sense to organise things so there is a virtual queue rather than an actual queue. The lorries and drivers can be off doing something useful while waiting their turn.

  • Why no tailbacks of lorries taking boxes to load onboard ship for non-EU Countries?

    Were there such tailbacks prior to the EU, 1993 or prior to the EEC, 1973?

    If the hold up is in France, won’t all the trucks be blocking French ports and roads?

    If ferry operators are unable to unload at French ports because of congestion, ferries will stop, ferry companies go out of business. Likely?

    Maybe the assumption is the tailbacks will be caused UK side because the UK will introduce outgoing Customs checks. Why?

    Supposedly, the EU is planning direct ferry routes from Cork and Dublin to Rotterdam and Belgian ports to avoid transit via England and Customs formalities. I wonder why the Irish don’t do this already? Time? Cost? Profitable for ferry operators?

Share
Published by
Tim Worstall

Recent Posts

The BBC and terrorism

The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…

3 years ago

We Should Pay Medical Personnel For Each Procedure They Perform

It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…

3 years ago

The Scrubbers Are Failing

In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…

3 years ago

Wondering whether an idea is actually correct or not

There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…

4 years ago

Is Cryptocurrency Our Revolution, Or Theirs?

When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…

4 years ago

Playing The Mischief With Us

As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…

4 years ago