Categories: Gender

Memo To Feminists – Male And Female Voices Are Different

What a surprise, we’ve the coopting of Christmas traditions to lay out the feminist case for something or other. Here it’s the idea that all male choirs are an abomination unto the Earth Mother and really, something must be done. At which point, well, you know, reality? Male and female voices are different – and yes, that extends to the time before puberty. And yes, we do have rather substantial proof of this.

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]Why do so many choirs exclude women? It’s time for this outdated practice to change
We all love the soaring harmonies of a full chorus at Christmas, but many choral institutions still don’t let women sing[/perfectpullquote]

Well, one start to it would be that they’re private institutions and how they run themselves is up to them. If we’re to have any meaning at all to liberty then that does have to be true. But leaving aside the basic philosophic point there really are times when men and women are sufficiently different that we’d want to rationally discriminate. Voice is one of them perhaps.

This being not really true:

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]One argument often made to justify excluding women is that men and boys alone offer a unique sound. And there are a lot of defendants of the tradition. Yet studies have found that the line between boy and girl trebles is much blurrier than most people think.[/perfectpullquote]

Who did the studies, why and how? For “studies show” is a weasel phrase. But we do in fact know differently. A counter-tenor is a very different voice from the female range equivalent. So much so that we’ve the example of the castrati – that female voice range but with the power of the male voice. So different that they used to hack the wobbly bits off* entire cohorts of boys in the hope that one or two might be able to sing as adults.

Now, whether this is sufficient justification – well, that’s not our business is it? These are private organisations who can use anything they damn well like. Just as any group of whatever sex or gender are entirely at liberty to sing as and with whom they wish in their own set ups. The important bit being this over here belongs to them, what you do belongs to you. You know, this liberty thing?

*Well, not quite, more usually a thread used to kill the testicles but it would be done on an entire cohort of orphan boys, not knowing who would be able to sing after puberty.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Tim Worstall

View Comments

  • There's no law, innit, against starting a choir with some, most or all female voices and let's see how it goes. Feminism not being a New Idea someone has probably tried that already and found that not enough are interested, either in lending their throats or their ears to the sweet bird's note.

Share
Published by
Tim Worstall

Recent Posts

The BBC and terrorism

The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…

3 years ago

We Should Pay Medical Personnel For Each Procedure They Perform

It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…

3 years ago

The Scrubbers Are Failing

In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…

3 years ago

Wondering whether an idea is actually correct or not

There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…

4 years ago

Is Cryptocurrency Our Revolution, Or Theirs?

When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…

4 years ago

Playing The Mischief With Us

As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…

4 years ago