Categories: Immigration

All A Bit Fascist, Isn’t It? GoodThink And Immigration

We can all see what the underlying idea here is but it does sound remarkably fascist, authoritarian, doesn’t it? Only companies which display GoodThink will be allowed to sponsor people to be come immigrants. Roughly, that’s what Javid is saying here. And I, for one, think such ideological status tests stink, stink to high heaven.

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]Organisations that fail to uphold British values to be barred from recruiting foreign workers[/perfectpullquote]

Entirely true, we’d prefer not to allow BackPackBombsRUs to be recruiting their live demonstration models from Peshawar. But insisting upon values is a terribly difficult precedent:

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] Organisations or companies that fail to uphold “British values” will be blacklisted and barred from recruiting foreign staff in a Government bid to counter extremism. The move, unveiled by Sajid Javid, the Home Secretary, is designed to disrupt groups suspected of stirring extremism, prevent them from bringing in like-minded recruits from abroad and stop them potentially radicalising young workers. [/perfectpullquote]

What are those British values? Polly might claim that abortions for all are – meaning no Catholic organisation may import foreign workers. Owen might insist that equality is – therefore no fruit farmer can have low paid pickers.

That is, the moment we’ve an ideological litmus test we’ve got to start wondering whose and what ideologies. History not telling us that we end up only excluding the violent thugs.

McDonnell might insist that support for capitalism is unBritish – bang goes all those foreigners in The City. Certainly we can imagine some BDS types arguing that Orthodox Judaism is anathema thus no Rabbis allowed to come in and take over flocks.

No, once the law is based upon ideas rather than acts then we’ve crossed that line from that desirable rule of law to rule by ideologues. Not a happy time for those being ruled often enough.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Tim Worstall

View Comments

  • Javid is of course just politicking and raising his profile, no doubt he would like to remain (not in the EU?) but in the cabinet, just a few days ago he even praised Nigel Farage.

    This policy proposal is more than a bit fascistic as well as being unworkable and as such it is not only fraught will real dangers, it is to use British vernacular, bloody silly and Javid is a plonker.

  • This could be turned into a useful Catch-22 if it was considered against British values to import labour when it is available here..

  • Oh, and it occurs to me that the EU is currently the guardian of values, and it is their values which would have to be paramount in this ridiculous proposal. I don't like rules where subjective moral judgments will decide who gets to do what.

Share
Published by
Tim Worstall

Recent Posts

The BBC and terrorism

The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…

3 years ago

We Should Pay Medical Personnel For Each Procedure They Perform

It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…

3 years ago

The Scrubbers Are Failing

In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…

3 years ago

Wondering whether an idea is actually correct or not

There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…

4 years ago

Is Cryptocurrency Our Revolution, Or Theirs?

When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…

4 years ago

Playing The Mischief With Us

As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…

4 years ago