Deprecated: Optional parameter $output declared before required parameter $atts is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/daabdfcs/continentaltelegraph.com/wp-content/plugins/td-composer/legacy/common/wp_booster/td_wp_booster_functions.php on line 1570

Deprecated: Optional parameter $depth declared before required parameter $output is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/daabdfcs/continentaltelegraph.com/wp-content/plugins/td-cloud-library/includes/tdb_menu.php on line 251
Peabrain Theories - It's Capitalism That Killed Eric Garner - Continental Telegraph
Categories: Newspaper Watch

Peabrain Theories – It’s Capitalism That Killed Eric Garner

Those with good memories might recall Eric Garner. He was selling “loosies” – single cigarettes – from untaxed supplies. At which point the police arrested him, during the course of the arrest he was put into a choke hold and yes, that does mean what it sounds like, whereupon he died.

Foul and appalling, clearly and obviously.

Then we get to peabrain theories – it was capitalism that killed him:

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] What’s been lost in this retrospective was Mr. Garner’s defiant stand minutes earlier when he was first confronted by the police for the economic “high crime and misdemeanor” of selling single individual, untaxed cigarettes. “It stops today,” said the normally affable Garner. He knew the drill. He had been arrested before for depriving the state of the tax revenue on a pack of cigarettes that goes for $14 so as to feed his family. [/perfectpullquote]

Biased a bit there but we’re fine with that. It is obviously absurd to kill someone for depriving the state and city of tobacco taxes.

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]When the poor and working class, living in society’s shrinking margins resist even verbally, like Mr. Garner did, they risk feeling the full physical force of a legal system 24-7 . It is all about using the police to enforce the pecking order as defined by capitalist economics even if it takes lives in the process.[/perfectpullquote]

Eh? What in buggery do the capitalists have to do with this?

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]The power alchemy of late-stage vulture capitalism in a place like New York City transcends race.[/perfectpullquote]

Whut?

Then we get told that if you look at it the right way then Bill De Blasio might be considered corrupt. Well, that’s knock us down with a feather stuff.

But capitalism killed Garner?

The tax is imposed by the state. Further, the imposition of ever higher taxes – well past the Laffer Curve peak in NYC as it happens – is very much a progressive left shibboleth, not something the capitalists try to impose. Quite the contrary actually, the capitalists who run the cigarette companies would rather prefer lower taxes so they could sell more.

And no, they don’t care about untaxed sales either. They get their nut when they sell the packs either way.

But then when did we expect anything other than pinhead economic theories from Salon?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Tim Worstall

View Comments

  • Why is capitalism so often to blame, especially in this case when it seems that poor police practise is likely responsible?

    Perhaps a more interesting question is why capitalism rarely gets the credit it deserves for having done more than any other human activity to reduce suffering.

    Possibly the answer to both queries is that capitalism, unlike socialism, is not a man-made philosophical construct, what we call capitalism is simply observed behaviour. It is a natural inclination of human beings to carry out, as social animals, productive and transactional activities that help both the individual and society at large to thrive.

    Perhaps capitalism is then resented because the humble ice-cream vendor is both wiser and a more constructive member of the human race than the Marxist emeritus professor.

    That must be it, capitalism inculcates a sense of inferiority amongst socialists, that is why they disparage it so.

  • I think you've fallen for fake news here. He was not put in a choke hold. Yes, he was restrained around the head and neck, but they did not cut off his oxygen supply. He suffered a heart attack because he was 300 pounds and resisted a lawful arrest.

  • @ Esteban - I think you've fallen for fake news here.

    The police went to arrest Garner for the 'crime' of selling 'loosies' - except that he wasn't. He'd been arrested for this before, to be sure - but he wasn't doing it when they went to arrest him this time. So they arrested him on suspicion of committing a crime without any evidence that he was, in fact, committing it, also known as ' an unlawful arrest'. His actual 'crime', of course, was arguing with the officers and refusing to 'cooperate', also known as 'contempt of cop'.

    As to the means of restraint, you weren't there and you have absolutely no way to know that what was done to him, is what you say was done to him. You are, in effect, repeating the defense of Officer Pantaleo, which is (basically) 'yes, I wrapped my highly-muscled left arm around his neck, with the bicep on the side of the neck and the forearm completely under the chin, locked my right and left hands together, and applied great pressure - but I didn't choke him out, oh dearie me, no - that would be a violation of policy! No, I merely restrained him! Yeah, that's what I did!'

    I've seen the chokehold applied. It is visually indistinguishable from the images of Officer Pantaleo 'restraining' Garner. The chokehold can either cut off a person's breathing, or the blood flow in the neck, or both, depending on just how it is applied. The autopsy found hemorrhaging in the great vessels of his neck. The medical examiner ruled it a homicide. The NYPD internal investigation concluded that it was a chokehold, and recommended that Officer Pantaleo be disciplined for using it. At this point, arguing about whether Garner was killed because the chokehold cut off his breathing or cut off his blood flow is heading into angels-on-pinheads territory. Officer Pantaleo killed Eric Garner by violently assaulting him for no legitimate reason, in the course of trying to arrest him without lawful grounds for doing so.

    llater,

    llamas

Share
Published by
Tim Worstall

Recent Posts

The BBC and terrorism

The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…

3 years ago

We Should Pay Medical Personnel For Each Procedure They Perform

It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…

3 years ago

The Scrubbers Are Failing

In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…

3 years ago

Wondering whether an idea is actually correct or not

There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…

4 years ago

Is Cryptocurrency Our Revolution, Or Theirs?

When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…

4 years ago

Playing The Mischief With Us

As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…

4 years ago