Labour’s Nationalisation Of The Grid Simply Might Not Work

This is rather fun:

The two leading power companies have quietly shifted ownership of their British operations into offshore companies to protect against Jeremy Corbyn’s threat of cut-price nationalisation, The Sunday Times can reveal.

National Grid and SSE, which together own Britain’s entire gas and electricity transmission spine, this weekend confirmed they had created overseas holding companies in recent months to seek shelter from Labour’s renationalisation agenda. SSE has put its UK business into a new Swiss holding company; National Grid has shifted its gas and electricity businesses into new subsidiaries in Luxembourg and Hong Kong.

The moves are designed to build defences against Labour’s sweeping renationalisation plans. Switzerland, Luxembourg and Hong Kong have “bilateral investment treaties” with the UK that ensure investors are paid properly in the event of any state asset grab.

It means that Labour can go and buy the grid, certainly. But that it must pay full market price for it. None of this “Parliament will decide the price” stuff will work. Because the price must be, by that international law, the full market price. Can’t go around saying the book value of the assets, or that minus the dividends investors have received – both ideas that have been floated – and the idea that they can be bought simply with an issuance of gilts is also pretty dodgy.

And, of course, this is why we have investor treaties and that investor state dispute settlement system – ISDS – in the first place. So that governments can’t rip people off.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Tim Worstall

View Comments

  • If a Socialist government has to pay the full price for a company, it will have many techniques for lowering that price. Simply pass legislation which makes that company uneconomic to operate, for one. If 'running the grid' becomes a loss-making exercise, the company which does it is essentially worthless...

  • National Grid set up a holding company in -- Hong Kong??

    That's the kind of executive decision-making the UK needs more of.

  • The bane of progressives everywhere are those people who make moves to protect themselves from them. There oughta' be a law.

  • SSE is a holder of the Fair Tax Mark (TM)
    I know that seeking to avoid nationalisation at confiscatory prices is not the same as avoiding tax whatever that means, but I wonder if they will be re-awarded the FTM next time it's due for renewal now they are using a Swiss holding company.
    Could be fun.

Share
Published by
Tim Worstall

Recent Posts

The BBC and terrorism

The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…

3 years ago

We Should Pay Medical Personnel For Each Procedure They Perform

It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…

3 years ago

The Scrubbers Are Failing

In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…

3 years ago

Wondering whether an idea is actually correct or not

There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…

4 years ago

Is Cryptocurrency Our Revolution, Or Theirs?

When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…

4 years ago

Playing The Mischief With Us

As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…

4 years ago