From our Swindon correspondent:

From the BBC

The NHS is revising the booking system for Covid-19 jabs in England after complaints that it could reveal individuals’ vaccination status.

By entering details such as their name, date of birth and postcode it may be possible to work out if another person has been given both doses, one or none.

Privacy campaigners Big Brother Watch called it a “shocking failure”.

NHS Digital said the system had no direct access to medical records and allowed millions to quickly book jabs.

It’s rare that I defend government IT projects, but in this case, the NHS made the right call.
If you start adding in full identity checking into that online system, it’s going to take longer to get done. It means building the identity checking code. It means getting usernames and passwords to people. They also need email addresses, in case they forget that password, and their GP might still have one from 3 years ago, so you need to check all of that. You also need a team of support staff to back up all of that, like if they change ISP, or if the password request email goes into their spam folder,
Under normal circumstances this would be bad behaviour. But we’re in a pandemic. People are dying from this, the country is running up massive debts. On balance, it’s a reasonable trade-off. It’s also worth pointing out that when I call the NHS by phone, these are the same questions I get asked: what’s your name and address and date of birth? But no-one cares if the same data is used to verify by phone.
Privacy is often treated as an absolute rather than a trade-off. Most people don’t care if they get cookies. They just hammer at that “OK” button to Get On With It. GDPR cost a fortune to implement, but almost no customers out there care.
5 3 votes
Article Rating
Tim Worstall

View Comments

  • I'm one of the people who cares about cookies, GDPR and online privacy but completely agree with you about this. Hell, if anyone wants to know about my vaccination status they don't even need to find out my DOB and postcode to access the booking system, they can just ask me. (Just had my second if anyone is interested.)

  • So once again, Covid "changes everything." We must rush out on-line booking without agreed-on safeguards because, how many millions did Imperial College say will die? How many "cases" were reported last week without disclosing the sensitivity of the tests? It sounds like the same ad-hoc "principles" used for the vaccine itself, also for a minimal-human-contact Presidential election.

  • Agree with both of you. Spike, your point is valid, but once we've decided that this is an emergency the rules should change and the box-checkers shouldn't hold things up like they do in normal times. Amazed that they didn't.

    As to whether the case was sufficiently made that this was an emergency justifying Lockdown, yeah, that's a whole 'nother ball of poo.

Share
Published by
Tim Worstall
Tags: covid

Recent Posts

The BBC and terrorism

The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…

3 years ago

We Should Pay Medical Personnel For Each Procedure They Perform

It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…

3 years ago

The Scrubbers Are Failing

In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…

4 years ago

Wondering whether an idea is actually correct or not

There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…

4 years ago

Is Cryptocurrency Our Revolution, Or Theirs?

When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…

4 years ago

Playing The Mischief With Us

As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…

4 years ago