Categories: Business

The New Solution To The Utilities – Let’s Jus’ Steal ‘Em

Well, this deserves marks for the brazenness of it at least. The utilities – water, electricity etc – should not be private for profit companies. This is taken as a given. But to renationalise them would cost lots of money and that would be bad. That would limit what a new Labour government could spend on other things. Like indoor jobs, no heavy lifting, for the dimmer members of the haute bourgeois and that would be bad, wouldn’t it?

So, a new solution is needed:

Rather than abandon its ideals, Labour needs to be more imaginative in explaining how these promises can be fulfilled. The water companies, energy networks, and Royal Mail should be reincorporated as public benefit corporations, required to place the public good ahead of profits. The state could hold a “golden share” that would enable it to appoint the non-executive directors who would be tasked with securing the public interest. The corporations would be privately owned but their purpose would be the public good.

Such an approach would promote economic justice better than nationalisation. Shareholders’ equity would be stranded in companies that would no longer pay out excessive dividends funded by debt rather than profit. The value of their shares would inevitably drop as public benefit, rather than profit maximisation, became the primary purpose. It would be a fitting price to pay for so many years of exploitation. And it would cost the public purse next to nothing.

So, instead, let’s jus’ steal ’em from the people who own them.

No, that is what is being said. Destroy the income from those shares, destroy the value of those shares and don’t compensate them in any manner at all. Steal it all in short.

Tom Kibasi is a writer and researcher on politics and economics

So, what should we go steal from Mr. Kibasi then?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Tim Worstall

View Comments

  • Notice though he justifies it by claiming "exploitation".

    And what is "the public good" and who decides? Cos it won't be the public will it?

    Do these people never examine their ideas for the obvious (and often demonstrated) flaws?

  • Errr... those dividends to shareholders are funded by debt *borrowed* *from* *those* *shareholders*. WTF does he think buying shares is? Temporarily passing use of your capital to a company in return for being paid for the loan of that capital.

    Yep, being thick is an employment requirement for Guardian staffers.

Share
Published by
Tim Worstall

Recent Posts

The BBC and terrorism

The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…

3 years ago

We Should Pay Medical Personnel For Each Procedure They Perform

It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…

3 years ago

The Scrubbers Are Failing

In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…

3 years ago

Wondering whether an idea is actually correct or not

There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…

4 years ago

Is Cryptocurrency Our Revolution, Or Theirs?

When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…

4 years ago

Playing The Mischief With Us

As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…

4 years ago