That The Guardian is often more interested in advancing the narrative rather than explaining the truth is obvious. But they don’t quite always manage to ignore their own evidence in their own articles. Today they have on the subject of deaths in and just after police custody. The numbers are up and this is blamed upon austerity in provision for mental health services. Which could, obviously, be true. Except they then present evidence which rather contradicts that narrative. We’d rather hope that such pesky facts at least get explained away but that’s not how narratives are constructed, is it?
Police custody deaths have hit their highest level in a decade with police, campaigners and experts warning that austerity and a crisis in mental health services have driven the figure up.
See? It’s all Tory Austerity. Yet it’s that “in a decade” which should give pause, no? But when was a decade ago? That would be 2007-08, before this Tory Austerity, wouldn’t it? So it’s not entirely obvious that a number the same before and after austerity is down to austerity, is it?
There’s also the slightly uncomfortable for the narrative fact that mental health budgets have been rising quite strongly this past couple of years.
The actual likely explanation here is random variance in a very small number. That being the sort of thing which happens with such statistics anyway. But if austerity fits the narrative why not use it? Given that fostering the narrative is the purpose of The Guardian, rather than trying to explain the world to us of course.
The language we use matters - it provides clarity to our own thoughts and enables…
It is now generally acknowledged that the structure of the NHS needs to be overhauled…
In the film Apollo 13, a loss of oxygen causes the crew to start inadvertently…
There's an idea out there which seems intuitive but then so many ideas do seem…
When we think about the darkly opaque goals of modern central bankers as they relate…
As the papers recently filled with the distressing images of desperate souls looking to escape…
View Comments
After Dr. Thomas Szasz: The brain may become diseased. The mind cannot be diseased. The mind is a method of organizing reality. It may be a social problem, but it is not a disease, that someone's mind organizes reality in a way that encourages misconduct.
Most minds, even those of criminals, work quite well at determining what misbehavior the individual can get away with. I think the biggest variable in the level of misconduct is the degree to which government is resolute about redressing misconduct.
Forces, such as those behind this article, whose view on misconduct or "mental health" is mostly to find new individuals to pair with case-workers to increase funding, are unlikely to reduce misconduct or increase "mental health." This is another problem ready to become an institution.