It’s A Pity Tom Kibasi Doesn’t Know Anything About The Economics Of Brexit

7
1955

Tom Kibasi is at one or other of the leftish think tanks and therefore, by definition, doesn’t know his economic arse from his elbow. This coming into stark relief when he starts to talk about the effects of Brexit. For he’s claiming that the European Union will, through general nefarity, manage to steal away all Britain’s industry. Without realising that they’ve simply not got the ability to do so.

Sigh:

Instead, the EU’s response to a no deal will be strategic: opening up advantage, sector by sector, calmly and patiently dismantling the UK’s leading industries over the course of a decade. They will eat the elephant one bite at a time. The problem with abandoning the rules of the international order is that you no longer enjoy their protection. A no-deal Brexit would hand the EU enormous power: it would decide how and when to introduce new frictions between the UK and the single market, giving sufficient time for firms like Airbus, Nissan or AstraZeneca to relocate production. As recent decisions have demonstrated, even seemingly fixed capital investment is more mobile than many Brexiters imagine. The EU would set out a timeline over which it would introduce compliance and rules of origin checks on the UK’s most competitive exporting sectors. It is not hard to imagine checks on automotive parts from 2021, pharmaceuticals from 2022 and aerospace from 2023, alongside constantly shifting sands of equivalence for financial services. This would allow firms an orderly departure from the UK to the single market. It will be a steady drift away from the UK, not an avalanche. Moreover, the absence of any agreement would mean lasting uncertainty that would deter future investment.

The EU has been trying to do this to world trade and world industry for decades now. Their success rate has been what?

Quite, we do all know the tech giants that Europe has produced as a result of making life difficult for the Americans, don’t we? It’s simply dribble here.

And then it gets worse:

The UK is particularly exposed in this regard: our serious lack of competitiveness is demonstrated by persistently large trade deficits. This means the UK is heavily reliant on foreign investment – the “kindness of strangers” – which would likely collapse. It is not hard to imagine a future government going cap in hand to the IMF for a bailout.

Getting the basics of the balance of payments wrong is embarrassing for anyone purporting to tell us about economics. We can’t have a balance of payments crisis. It’s simply not possible.

By definition the surplus on the capital account – that foreign investment which is the kindness of strangers – is equal and opposite to the deficit on the current account, our buying more imports than we sell exports. This isn’t arguable, it’s a definition.

The only thing that can screw this up is if we try to fix the prices at which all these things happen. That is, have a fixed exchange rate. In the absence of that the price of pounds will change in order to reach that definitional balance of payments.

So, quick question, do we have a fixed exchange rate? As we did when we did have to go to the IMF? Ah, no, we don’t, we’ve a floating exchange rate. Meaning that it’s not actually possible for us to have a balance of payments crisis. We can have a change in the price of pounds but it’s that very thing which ensures – absolutely and totally – that we can’t have a balance of payments crisis.

Do note that this isn’t some left or right thing. We’re not talking about some free market zealot like me facing off against a – hmm, IPPR, dunno, socialist? Social democratic? – different vision of how the world should be. This is basic, basic, stuff, like talking about gravity in physics, not how many dimensions do branes have?

The Brexit fantasists’ riposte is that the Europeans have as much to lose since the UK is an important export market and we run a large trade deficit with the single market. But one of the legacies of Thatcher’s deindustrialisation is that the UK lacks the industrial base to switch from foreign to domestic production. It simply no longer exists, thanks to the 1980s shock therapy of the very same disaster capitalists that now champion no-deal.

Britain’s manufacturing output is higher than it was when Thatcher left office. It’s very much higher than when she gained office.

Higher than when Thatcher either gained or left office

Those same Brexiters who have marched from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm still bizarrely believe that the UK could pocket the £39bn divorce bill while pursuing trade deals around the world. Yet the EU would, calmly and rationally, place tariffs on UK trade until it had collected what it is owed.

Isn’t that a lovely and super idea? Tariffs are paid by those buying the goods. So, the EU does this and it’s European consumers who would be paying the British divorce bill. Why wouldn’t we like such a deal?

Tom Kibasi is director of the Institute for Public Policy Research, and founder and chair of the IPPR Commission on Economic Justice

I think it might be possible to understand lefty economics and lefty think tanks now. They’ve simply not got the first clue of actual economics which is why they keep getting it all wrong.

7
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
moqifenRhoda KlappHJ777Q46Quentin Vole Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jonathan Harston
Guest
Jonathan Harston

That’s a good line. Make Europe Pay!

Rhoda Klapp
Guest
Rhoda Klapp

I note that the devastated industrial sector which hardly makes any stuff will have big problems with its exports to WTO countries which are already at sea. Either there’s no industry or there’s lots of exports. Which is it today?

In other EU news, France and Italy are fighting over majority holding in a French shipyard. They can’t even act as a union between conflicting national interests in neighbouring countries.

Quentin Vole
Guest
Quentin Vole

Is the EU planning to leave the WTO? If not, they can’t apply special tariff arrangements only to the UK.

Q46
Guest
Q46

The premise is that UK industry only serves the EU, 15% of the World economy – and a stagnant economy too. It overlooks the advantages to UK industry freed up to trade with that 85% of the global economy where most of the growth is happening.

How has it become the case that so many people believe, a) the EU always existed; b) it is the whole World; c) everywhere else, ‘There Be Dragons’?

HJ777
Guest
HJ777

But one of the legacies of Thatcher’s deindustrialisation is that the UK lacks the industrial base to switch from foreign to domestic production.

This is complete drivel. Manufacturing output grew by nearly 20% under the Thatcher/Major government compared to 1979. It fell (by over 10%) under the Blair/Brown government.

Rhoda Klapp
Guest
Rhoda Klapp

“The UK lacks the industrial base..”

What exactly IS an industrial base? Is it truly something to be planned and ordered by government, or is it in fact a load of individual enterprises of various sizes which take their own decisions and make their own plans, good or bad, in their own perceived interest? And without any thought for the future of the UK in any real way. And government can only eff it up.

moqifen
Guest
moqifen

I note the glee in which this arsehole gloats about a possible dismantling of the uk by the EU. You’ve defied your masters now eat dirt peasants! Can the remoaners get more vile. Needs to be tied in a sack , beaten with metal bars and chucked in the channel and told to swim to his euro paradise.