Realist, not conformist analysis of the latest financial, business and political news

Mnangagwa’s Trivially Easy Target For Zimbabwe – Middle Income Country By 2030

Emmerson Mnangagwa, the President of Zimbabwe, has set himself a trivially easy task for the economy, to become a middle income country by 2030. All he needs to do is get the Zimbabwean government to stop doing stupid things and it’ll happen. Sure, given the influence of Robert Mugabe, both in the past and in the current background, this will be a task, but it’s still a pretty simple target. The thing being, from where Zimbabwe is now, from where it has been, there’s very little other than getting out of the way that needs to be done.

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa has announced the formation of a 24-member advisory council comprising captains of industry drawn from telecoms, tourism, infrastructure, health, media and financial services. Mnangagwa said the council would help him formulate key economic policies and strategies to advance Vision 2030, his ambitious drive to turn Zimbabwe into a middle-income country. [/perfectpullquote]

It’s not that ambitious to be honest. The definition’s clear:

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]Each year on July 1, the World Bank revises analytical classification of the world’s economies based on estimates of gross national income (GNI) per capita for the previous year. The updated GNI per capita estimates are also used as input to the World Bank’s operational classification of economies that determines lending eligibility. As of 1 July 2015, low-income economies are defined as those with a GNI per capita, calculated using the World Bank Atlas method, of $1,045 or less in 2014; middle-income economies are those with a GNI per capita of more than $1,045 but less than $12,736;[/perfectpullquote]

GNI and GDP aren’t the same thing but they’re close enough for our purposes here. And that’s a pretty easy task for Zimbabwe:


It would be reasonable to say that when Zimbabwe’s not being ruled by someone intent on destroying the economy then it is a middle income country. Yes, that’s a post-inflation measurement in that chart. So, stop being intent on destroying the economy and she’ll be right.

For it is true that growth back to what was is easier than growth for the first time. People who’ve been in an economy that works tend to recall at least a goodly part of what it is that makes an economy work. This is why Germany went from bombed flat rubble in 1945 to richer than it had been in 1939 by the mid-1950s. Mugabe’s destruction of the place will be felt for a very long time in terms of wealth and income lost but it’s not that tough to get back to where it all was before him.

Hoping that Zimbabwe will get to middle income country status by 2030 is an easy target. The only thing that will stop it in fact is if the government continues to implement straightforwardly stupid economic policies.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jonathan Harston
Jonathan Harston
5 years ago

There seems to be an obsession hard-wired into people’s brains to *DO* something. In the vast majority of cases, the best action is inaction, but the doesn’t fit with the mindset to *do* something to get to a solution.

cf Brexit, etc. The best solution to the Ireland border issue is to not do anything, but there is an obsession with *doing* something, even if it’s doing nothing. Campaigners obsess over legislating to do nothing – no, the solution is to *NOT* legislate to do anything.

nae a belger
nae a belger
5 years ago

Just look at Botswana and do what they do. Then you should do better because you have significant natural resources and an educated population.

5 years ago

Good-oh, a 24-member advisory council to do some central planning. What could go wrong?

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x