Philip Augar is running a review into university fees, student loans and all that sort of thing. It’s the usual Great and the Good type report, chair this review, deliver the right political answer, get admitted to that nice club in SW1. The right political answer rarely being the right economic one of course.
What should be happening is that fees rise, student loans be charged higher interest rates and, the point of all of this, fewer people go to university. For the mistake being made is to think that if degrees aren’t worth it then we should reduce the price. Nope – if degrees aren’t worth it then people shouldn’t be doing them:[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] University tuition fees and interest rates on student loans should be slashed, a report will recommend this week as ministers warn that many degrees are terrible value for money. The Augar review of higher education is expected to call for annual tuition fees to be cut from £9,250 to £7,500 and interest rates on student loans to be reduced from 6.3% to as little as 1.5%. The review, chaired by the banker Philip Augar, aims to ease financial pressures on young people and help to divert them from university degrees to vocational and technical courses. Further education colleges will receive a cash boost. [/perfectpullquote]
Most student loans aren’t repaid. That is, most default even though we don’t call it that, we say the graduates aren’t earning enough to have to repay them. If you’ve a high default rate then the interest charged should be higher.
But then there’s that other problem. Some to many degrees aren’t worth it. Lifetime earnings diminish as a result of gaining one. This has been true of an arts degree for a man for some time now. This isn’t in fact because of the price of doing the degree. It’s because of the time taken to do it and the earnings lost as a result. That is, it’s not a problem solved by reducing the fees charged, it’s one solved by not doing the degree.
So, how do we dissuade people from doing things? We raise the price. Thus we want to increase the cost, not reduce it, of doing a degree in order to reduce the number of people who do degrees.
As and when – if – those doing degrees are carrying the full freight of a degree being done then of course it’s entirely up to them how they spend their lives. Or what they earn in them. But only once they are paying full freight.
So, the actual answer to all of this is free the universities to charge anything they damn well want to. Then leave damn well alone. Sadly that’s not an answer that gains a seat on the red benches so it’s not the answer that will be given.