Why The Earl Of Shrewsbury Is Wrong About Female Inheritance

3
857

On the face of it this looks like a welcome change tin modern society toward greater gender parity.

Of course, it’s still a damn fool idea:

One of the UK’s most senior hereditary peers, who had been a leading critic of reform, has performed an about turn by calling for a change in law so daughters can inherit their titles.

Despite voting down such a Bill in 1994, the Earl of Shrewsbury will use a debate on Tuesday to insist the system “should and must” be changed.

There are around 2,000 hereditary titles in the UK and, apart from some Scottish titles, virtually all can only be handed down to sons, not daughters.

As is obvious from that point about Scottish titles and “almost” it was actually possible, when the title was granted, for female inheritance to be included. Often it wasn’t. So, it’s sons all the way down.

And if we decide to change that? Well, that initial claim was that sons all the way down should be honoured and given a place to rule over the rest of us. Changing the initial claim to allow daughters to do so opens up that box of changing the claim, doesn’t it? And we no longer do believe that children all the way down should be honoured and given a place to rule over us.

We have long, long, done the royal and King or Queen bit by female inheritance. But not the aristocratic titles. And if we’re to reopen that debate then there’s a very good argument that the titles themselves – and the honour and the ruling – should go along with the primogeniture.

And even if not that then why only the firstborn? Leaving aside the point that that’s the only one that paternity is reasonable assured of in the aristocracy.

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
1 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
3 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
ItellyounothingSnarkusJohn B Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
John B
Guest
John B

It also means the husband must take the wife’s family name, and the children have that name not Daddy’s – which is what happened to Philip and his offspring.

Some prospective husbands might not like that.

Snarkus
Guest
Snarkus

why not abolish the lot ? Government can then resell titles to highest bidders whenever title holder carks. Win, win. Revenue for the clerks to give to favoured wasters and some self selection of competent at accumulating wealth anyway as the temporary aristocrats. Gives social climbers an official way up !

Itellyounothing
Guest
Itellyounothing

You are behind by a decade or two. Life peerages are sold, it’s just uncouth to notice it, then a ruling Elite (Lab, Lib or Con) type might go to jail.