GM Foods – Greater Ignorance Leads To Greater Opposition To Them

4
1015

An interesting and useful proof of the Dunning Kruger Effect here, that it’s the truly ignorant who see themselves as the experts on matters. So it is with opposition to genetically modified foods, those GM Frankenfoods. Those who have no clue about genetics nor, indeed, food, are the ones storming the ramparts to insist that they should never be allowed and burn the test fields of them immediately. Certainly don’t let such abominations as golden rice prevent much of the world’s blindness.

Those who have a clue are in favour of GM foods. Dunning Kruger just explains so much about the world, doesn’t it?

There is widespread agreement among scientists that genetically modified foods are safe to consume and have the potential to provide substantial benefits to humankind. However, many people still harbour concerns about them or oppose their use. In a nationally representative sample of US adults, we find that as extremity of opposition to and concern about genetically modified foods increases, objective knowledge about science and genetics decreases, but perceived understanding of genetically modified foods increases. Extreme opponents know the least, but think they know the most. Moreover, the relationship between self-assessed and objective knowledge shifts from positive to negative at high levels of opposition. Similar results were obtained in a parallel study with representative samples from the United States, France and Germany, and in a study testing attitudes about a medical application of genetic engineering technology (gene therapy). This pattern did not emerge, however, for attitudes and beliefs about climate change.

That is indeed Dunning Kruger:

The findings are in line with the Dunning-Kruger effect, named after David Dunning and Justin Kruger of Cornell University, by which a low level of competence is directly correlated with high confidence in perceived competence. In lack of genuine knowledge, a person is unable to critically assess their performance in a given field of expertise, thus leading to an overestimation of their competence.

We need no other explanation for Greenpeace, Richard Murphy or Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, do we?

As one or other wiser than we has pointed out in the past, ignorance leads to certainty, wisdom to the acceptance of doubt.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Tony R.Jonathan HarstonMatt RyanSamarkand Tony Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Samarkand Tony
Guest
Samarkand Tony

Dunning and Kruger wrote a joke paper. Only people who don’t know that think the Dunning-Kruger effect is more than a statement of the obvious. That’s the joke, really.

Matt Ryan
Guest
Matt Ryan

What’s the intersection between people who are fervent climate change believers (because scientists say it’s true) and those who think GM foods are bad (because scientists lie)?

My supposition is that it’s quite large.

Jonathan Harston
Guest
Jonathan Harston

At the weekend I had genetically modified cabbage, genetically modified cabbage, genetically modified cabbage, genetically modified parsnip, genetically modified potatoes, genetically modified peas, genetically modified grass and genetically modified auroch. Yep, roast beef dinner. Savoy, cauli, sprouts, carrots, spuds, peas, gravy and beef.

Tony R.
Guest
Tony R.

Practically everything we eat is genetically modified and has been for thousands of years, as long as there has been agriculture and animal husbandry. People have been selecting plants and animals for certain desirable traits and breeding them for a long, long time.