Sunk Cost Fallacy Is Still A Fallacy Even With HS2

4
1393

From our Swindon Correspondent – you know, the home of the Great Western Railway?

The project has already cost so much that we should at least finish the London to Birmingham section, Sir Amyas Morse, the outgoing chief of the National Audit Office (NAO), said. The country would have to be in ‘a lot of economic trouble’ to pull the plug on the mammoth project, he said.

 
This is classic sunk-cost fallacy. We’ve already spent about £4.1bn. Now, maybe if we’ve spent that, and the benefits are more than the remaining costs, that’s worth it, but the benefits aren’t even there on the original estimates.
The government estimated £41.4 to 46.9bn of benefits. We’ve spent £4.1bn. The total cost is estimated at £56bn. Deduct 4.1 from 56 and you have a remaining cost of £51.9bn to yield a benefit of £46.9bn.
And that’s not accounting for the fact that, as Tim Worstall pointed out, they haven’t included people working on trains.
Nor does it include the fact that rail demand fell last year. Or that people are using their season tickets to make 378 journeys per year rather than the rail industry estimate of 480 journeys per year. The industry assumes people do 5 days in the office and maybe the odd trip on a weekend. 10.3 trips per week. But they’re actually doing 8.5 trips per week. Because since HS2 was created, we’ve had improvements in collaboration tools, a fall in the price of laptops, and lots of people are doing a day or two at home every week. The government has designed a railway with returns based on 60 years that are going to be 20% lower on day 1.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
seKxXcb5jZJohnQuentin Voleswannypol Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
swannypol
Guest
swannypol

It never did make economic sense. But even if it did now just about still break even comparing the unsunk costs to the future benefits:
There are at least 20 other rail infrastructure projects that give considerably higher rates of return, and about a thousand other non rail projects, all of which should be spent on before continuing to spend on HS2..it’s an opportunity cost situation.

Quentin Vole
Guest
Quentin Vole

A great deal of that £4 billion has been spent compulsorily purchasing properties that lie on the route (I understand HS2 now has one of the larger commercial property portfolios, by value). So if (when!) it’s cancelled, much of that value can be recovered by resale (might even make a profit).

seKxXcb5jZ
Guest
seKxXcb5jZ

Govt. would probably tell everyone in advance and then dump it all in one go.

John
Guest
John

If HS2 goes ahead to Birmingham then it must continue to the vital Crewe Hub. The extra cost to Crewe is not that great for the benefits it gives for such a short run. Then upgrading the lines from Crewe to Manchester and the line to Liverpool from Weaver Junction.