The normal end of life event for any apex animal is starvation. Sure, things like cancer, heart attacks, strokes, they all happen too. But age catches up, they can’t hunt or feed effectively, they die of starvation. Lions lose their teeth, orcas their speed and whales? Well, whales just starve.
So, when the population is at or beyond the limits the environment can support we should be hunting them, right?
[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]U.S. biologists probe deaths of 70 emaciated gray whales[/perfectpullquote]The corpses of these whales are washing up in the US West Coast.
[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] Many have little body fat, leading experts to suspect the die-off is caused by declining food sources in the dramatically warming waters of the northern Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea off Alaska. The gray whales summer there, consuming most of a year’s worth of nourishment to pack on the blubber they need to carry them through the migration south to wintering grounds off Mexico and back north to feeding grounds off Alaska. Sea ice has been at or near record lows in the Bering and Chukchi, and water temperatures have been persistently much higher than normal, an apparent consequence of human-caused climate change, scientists say. [/perfectpullquote]That is one possibility, certainly. But there’s another, one entirely natural:
[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] Another theory is that the number of whales has reached the limits of the environment’s natural capacity to sustain further population growth, scientists said on the call. The current estimated population of eastern North Pacific gray whales is about 27,000, the highest recorded by the agency since it began gray whale surveys in 1967, said biologist David Weller. [/perfectpullquote]Now the thing is that is the natural world. Populations expand to meet the available food supply – or more accurately the ecological niche they occupy. As Malthus pointed out that natural increase is very much faster than any increase in that food supply – and in the absence of farming that’s the way it’s going to stay.
Populations therefore do increase to the point that significant numbers of them starve. For non-apex animals this is offset by the number of predators that eat them instead. This not being something that normally happens to gray whales. Sure, orcas might take a calf but once to adulthood it’s lack of food that’s going to take them.
We’ve stopped predating upon gray whales. Thus the marginal population is starving to death. If we want to stop that then we should predate again.
The way to stop whales starving to death is to resume hunting whales.
But what would we use them for? Peasant food? Smelly candles?
The Japanese, Icelanders and a few others would eat them*, but there was only ever limited commercial hunting of Greys.
* most of the tiny numbers of whales caught commercially today end up as dog food
Japanese look on whale meat the way we look on tripe – peasant food that you only eat when desparate, but promoted as haute cusine by fashionable tossers.
I’ve eaten whalemeat in Iceland – nothing special, I preferred smoked puffin breast.
David Attenborough saving whales so they can starve to death.
It is the outcome of the Eco-loon-god-complex.
‘Another theory is that the number of whales has reached the limits of the environment’s natural capacity to sustain further population growth, ’
Lord, make this true for environmentalists too.