Realist, not conformist analysis of the latest financial, business and political news

Apparently Gun Laws Don’t Stop Mass Shootings

As we all know it’s a standard part of the American political debate that more restrictive gun laws will stop the terrifying spectacle of mass shootings. This has the merit, as an argument, of seeming plausible. If there are fewer guns out there then fewer people will go doollally with them.

It is not, however, as simple as that:

A man disguised as a police officer went on a 12-hour shooting rampage in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia, killing 16 people on Sunday, in the deadliest such attack in the country’s history. Officials said the suspected shooter was also dead.

Authorities said the suspected gunman – 51-year-old Gabriel Wortman – disguised himself as a police officer in uniform at one point and mocked up a car to make it seem like a Royal Canadian Mounted Police cruiser.

Gun laws in Canada are restrictive. True, that might not meet the desires of everyone on the restrictive side but it’s certainly more than currently happens in the US.

That restrictive gun laws will stop massacres is, as yet at least, unproven.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Total
0
Shares
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Addolff
Addolff
1 year ago

The shooter and the RCMP have history:http://archive.is/QpKxo

Michael van der Riet
Michael van der Riet
11 months ago
Reply to  Addolff

Blow them AWAY, Huxley!

stupidarse
stupidarse
1 year ago

They do seem to reduce murders with firearms in number, and the frequency of these horrors.

A reduction in HGVs logically will reduce the number of people run over by HGVs, but maniacs still seem to get hold of them and plow straight into crowds.

Spike
Spike
1 year ago
Reply to  stupidarse

They do seem to reduce murders. But they don’t reduce murders. Have you read anything by John Lott? “Maniacs” don’t obey laws and won’t obey the next one.

Spike
Spike
1 year ago

I scoured the news of the Nova Scotia massacre and there was no mention of Canada’s gun-control laws, which should have prevented it (as indeed the law against murder should have).

Anonymous coward
Anonymous coward
1 year ago

I believe the argument is that more restrictive gun laws *reduce* mass shootings.

Not saying it does or it doesnt. But as Tim likes to say, you do actually have to ask the right question to get the right answer.

Spike
Spike
1 year ago

The *argument* may be that more gun laws reduce shootings, but the *drumbeat* is that they will stop them. You don’t get a law passed by saying “This will take the scourge and…mitigate it a bit.”

Yes, bad headline, perhaps. Although it doesn’t matter much, as new gun laws neither reduce nor stop massacres. They effect a change on the prey and not on the predator.

Addolff
Addolff
11 months ago
Reply to  Spike

Trudope has just banned 1500 different types of firearms. 10,000’s Canadians now outlaws.
https://www.rebelnews.com/trudeau_bans_website_and_facebook_group_as_part_of_firearm_ban

Can you help support Continental Telegraph?

If you can spare a few pounds you can donate to our fundraising campaign below. All donations are greatly appreciated and go towards our server, security and software costs. 25,000 people per day read our sites and every penny goes towards our fight against the Establishment. We don't take a wage and do what we do because we enjoy it and hope our readers enjoy it too.


Donate
8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x