Realist, not conformist analysis of the latest financial, business and political news

Owen Jones Thinks Saudi Aramco Will Pump More Oil After Privatisation

Owen Jones’ latest mind burbling is that if only we nationalised the oil companies then climate change would be solved. Because wise government would be able to direct activities to the result that we don’t boil Flipper in the vapour of that last remaining ice floe. A contention to which the correct answer is you what you dribbling idiot?

Or, to be less flagrantly objectionable about it, anyone ever told Owen that it is state owned oil companies which pump the most oil? Like, say, Saudi Aramco?

The Saudi Aramco which is to be partially privatised. The implication of what Owen’s saying here being that privatisation will immediately turn that currently non-emittive corporation into a emittive one. Or summat:

[perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]So long as these sectors remain in private hands, they will continue to place short-term profit for elite investors ahead of the future of the planet and continued existence of humanity. They must be brought under public ownership, with a legal mandate to “green” the economy. One suggestion by the Next System Project is that the US government could create a community ownership of power administration, modelled on Roosevelt-era New Deal agencies. It would grant legal authority and funding mechanisms to buy back the energy grid and take over energy utilities.[/perfectpullquote] [perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]But there are more radical solutions. Since the crash, quantitative easing (QE) has been used extensively, with central banks creating money to buy bonds from financial institutions. Why not use QE to buy a controlling stake in the fossil fuel companies? It has been estimated that the US has spent nearly $6tn on its post-9/11 wars. If it has the resources to engage in catastrophic wars, could it not afford to pay a small fraction of that sum to help save the planet from destruction? The same goes for the banks – except rather than nationalising the risks and privatising the profit, as the state did in 2008, they should this time be brought under democratic, accountable public control.[/perfectpullquote] [perfectpullquote align=”full” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]These proposals will undoubtedly be dismissed as extreme,[/perfectpullquote]

No, they’re not extreme, they’re idiocy. Consider this list of oil companies with their revenue:

Saudi Aramco 465.49
Sinopec Group 448.00
China National Petroleum Corporation 428.62
Exxon Mobil 268.9
Royal Dutch Shell 265
Kuwait Petroleum Corporation 251.94
BP 222.8
Total SA 212
Lukoil 144.17
Eni 131.82
Valero Energy 130.84
Chevron Corporation 129.9
PDVSA 128.44
Pemex 117.50
National Iranian Oil Company 110.00**
Gazprom 106.3
Phillips 66 102.35
Petronas 100.74
China National Offshore Oil 98.53

We can argue a bit about some of them – Gazprom is quoted but anyone think it’s really not part of the Russian state? ENI and Italy? 9 – at least – of the top 19 are state owned. So, nationalising the ones that aren’t state owned will stop the oil pumping will it?


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

Owen also makes the point that the US has already spent trillions on this and that so hence must have trillions more available. The reverse seems more credible. Trillions have been spent/wasted so the US is out of money.

Matt Ryan
Matt Ryan
2 years ago

He has a point in a round about way.

Nationalise the oil companies so they are run by state appointed muppets (Tarquin can move from the Arts Council to Oil Council) under political control, remove all investment and naturally they’ll fail to pump so much oil. Hence reducing the output via sheer incompetence.

The boy Jones could be Oil Tsar to help things degrade as quickly as possible.

Quentin Vole
Quentin Vole
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt Ryan

Yes, PDVSA produces a lot less oil since Maduro nationalised it.

And, of course, it’s only ‘global elites’ (boo! hiss! ) who own oil company shares. None of them are owned by pension funds etc. It’s almost as though our Owen was a clueless, autistic 16-year-old … quick, invite him to address parliament!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x