Realist, not conformist analysis of the latest financial, business and political news

The Incredible Perceptiveness Of Richard Murphy

A Richard Murphy

Now of course we all expect The Guardian to get economics wrong. As with everything else – The Guardian, wrong about everything. Always. But those who would opine on economic affairs and the state of the world, we need to hold them to a higher standard.

Which brings us to this from Richard Murphy. He wants to tell us that developing country debt is the most appalling problem and therefore everyone should do as he says. Which he illustrates with this:

Note what it says up at the top there. $165 billion. It really is in $bn.

Now check his source in The Guardian:

D’ye see the change? $165 billion is trivia. 165% of GDP isn’t.

But now we’ve got the man insistent that the global economy should bend to his will unable to understand the difference between a cash sum and a percentage of GDP.

Richard Murphy, unable to spot the mistakes in The Guardian. It’s a great recommendation for an economics professor, isn’t it?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Total
0
Shares
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Spike
Spike
1 year ago

Guardian now has a footnote: “This article was amended on 9 January 2020 because the heading on an earlier version of the chart gave 165 as the dollar figure for 2018 debt in emerging and developing economics – instead of as the percentage of these countries’ GDP.”

They now say “almost 170% of gross domestic product in 2018 – or $55tn (£42tn)” So Murphy didn’t do it to exaggerate, as the real figures are even more shocking.

Mr Yan
Mr Yan
1 year ago
Reply to  Spike

That was Tim’s point – Professor Potato is too stupid to know the figure of $165bn was incorrect (because it was too low). He should have known the dollar value was far higher for it to be an actual problem.

Pcar
Pcar
1 year ago

Murphy is a fool

As soon as I saw that “$165bn” the ‘it’s wrong’ alarm bells started ringing; then I tried $165Tn but seems too high and $16.5Tn too low. Left seem to have severe difficulties with numbers

Chester Draws
Chester Draws
1 year ago

The growth is debt is largely private. That’s unlikely to lead to the debt issues of the past, which were government’s struggling to repay.

Michael van der Riet
Michael van der Riet
1 year ago

Note the lack of a comparative chart for fully emerged and developed countries. Context, context, context.

Van_Patten
Van_Patten
1 year ago

Read the rest of the entry – apparently he had the solution years ago. Ban advertising and consumption and turn the world economy (no mere UK for the Great potato) over to him and all the problems will solve themselves – to paraphrase ‘the Treasure of the Sierra Madre’ – ‘Growth, we don need no stinking growth’

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x