Is Jezza Stupid Or Just Plain Ignorant? The £10 Minimum Wage For Under 18s

6
1018

Sure and now we’re against the very idea of a minimum wage around here because we’re economically literate. Humans buy less of things that are more expensive. But even if we put aside logic and reason to enter the minimum wage debate on the more normal terms this decision by Jezza Cobyn is still remarkably stupid and or ignorant. Actually, given modern mores why be so exclusionary? It’s both. For he’s decided that his £10 minimum wage should apply to the under 18s as well.

The point here being that we do know that a minimum wage which is “too high” causes significant problems in the labour market. Wages higher than the value to be gained by employing someone mean there’s no job for them to be employed in. There is, among those who discuss such things as the minimum wage, no doubt about this point. The only argument is over the meaning of the word “too”.

We can argue about what that too really means, a useful rule of thumb being around 45 to 50% of the minimum wage. Phil Hammond is therefore being a fool with his 66% desire and Osborne was one with his 60%. But, you know, Tories, eh?

The thing is, as is also agreed by all the adults, the minimum wage harms those it binds upon. Who does a minimum wage bind hardest upon? The young and untrained. By definition, of course.

So, if you are going to have a minimum wage then you probably do want to have age bands to it. The higher rates for the older, more experienced and trained, lower for those who as yet have to prove their value to an employer. So, what does Grandpa Death announced?

Speaking at a party gathering in Birmingham on Saturday, Mr Corbyn said: “Equal pay for equal work is hardly a controversial idea, so why are we discriminating against young people? “You don’t get a discount at the shops for being under 18. “But if the person serving you on the other side of the counter is young, they could be on half the wage of their colleagues. “It’s time to end this discrimination. Young people’s work should be properly valued, not exploited by employers to cut their wage bill. If they’re doing the job, pay them the wage – the real living wage.”

Yep, some kid straight out of failing her GCSEs will have to be paid £10 an hour from the word go. Meaning, of course, a certain paucity of job offers for 16 year olds straight from failing their GCSEs. It’s no longer possible to pay the possibly less productive less therefore the possibly less productive won’t get paid.

I did actually say this was stupid or ignorant, didn’t I? For Jezza’s just announced the best policy we could think of to increase teenage unemployment. That is, it’s both stupid and ignorant.

6
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
Rhoda KlappKevin Ronald LohseBernie G.Mohave GreenieMatt Ryan Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jonathan Harston
Guest
Jonathan Harston

What Magic Grandpa fails to understand is that the minimum wage *prevents* equal pay for equal work, it forces employers to pay a floor price *regardless* of the work. The person doing £5-worth of work and the person doing £10-worth of work both have to be paid £10.

Matt Ryan
Guest
Matt Ryan

But because the young are also short of wisdom this will play well to them. Until of course they experience the outcome. By that point it’ll be too late however to reverse the damage.

Probably will be the evil Tories fault still (assuming they exist after May’s Brexit).

Mohave Greenie
Guest
Mohave Greenie

Unfortunately they won’t even understand that this has caused them to be unemployable. They won’t blame this on the minimum wage; they will blame the man is keeping them down. Most folks don’t understand that you are paid for the value you produce, not what you think you are worth.

Bernie G.
Guest
Bernie G.

As with the abolition of tuition fees, it will never happen.

Kevin Ronald Lohse
Guest
Kevin Ronald Lohse

The PS unions have negotiated pay agreements where there are graduated scales so that as a worker becomes more experienced, their pay increases. So for instance, a nurse with several years experience will be paid more than a similarly-qualified newly-trained nurse even though they’re doing the same tasks round the ward. Jezza has just driven a coach and horses through this system. Won’t his union paymasters be pleased?

Rhoda Klapp
Guest
Rhoda Klapp

In answer to your headline question, it is a false dichotomy. One does not preclude the other. Not a bit of it, both at the same time is the best explanation.