Realist, not conformist analysis of the latest financial, business and political news

Dear God How Can Anyone Be This Stupid About Race?

A young lady complaining about changing standards of beauty. She entirely and wholly missing the point:

Everything about me – specifically my racialised features as a Black mixed woman – felt “too much”. I remember the distinct feeling of wanting to shrink myself, melt myself down into something neater, smaller, sleeker – which is how I saw my white friends, and the beautiful white people on TV.

Then, in my early 20s, soon after moving to London from my home in Manchester, I began to notice a shift in how beauty was being represented. Suddenly, faces, hair and bodies that looked like mine were plastered on shop windows, grinning down from billboards, smizing (smiling with their eyes) from the pages of magazines. Every other TV ad featured mixed models or an interracial family.

White influencers began plumping their lips, baking their skin, braiding their hair, even undergoing invasive surgical procedures to create curves where none existed. The things about myself I had wanted to disguise or alter in my youth were now in vogue – and I struggled to get my head around that. How did it become “trendy” to look like me? And should I feel pleased about it?

Good grief. The first major change in the looks of the British population – the population of Britain that is – was the arrival of mass immigration. The black population of these isles was, in 1940, some 8,000 to 10,000 souls largely in the old port towns – Tiger Bay for Shirley Bassey and so on. Black and British was thus something rare and exotic and something that most Britons actually had no personal experience of at all.

The introduction of many a Brit to what a black looked like in person was the – segregated – American army of 1942 and onwards. Something which we dealt with rather better than the white part of the American army to be honest.

And then, of course, on to the arrivals of the past few decades. Those then leading, as is fairly common among humans, to rumpy and even pumpy and now we’ve the fastest growing section of the population, those who are classified as “mixed”.

So, as the mixed become a greater part of the population we’re seeing a greater visibility of the mixed. This is how societies work.

This then being something she wants to complain about?

And that is why it’s impossible to see the rise of mixed beauty ideals as a positive thing, because at its heart sits an unsettling insistence on white superiority.

Oh Dear God woman, seriously, get a grip. This is an excessive level of preciousness. Society is adapting to the joys of miscegenation – get over it.

That’s not the worst though, this is:

It wasn’t so long ago that the mixed population was being scrutinised with a similar energy but with an entirely different outcome. In the 1930s and 1940s, there were groups warning about the dangers of “race crossing”; there were calls for mixed people to be sterilised; we were denigrated as deviant, stupid, contaminated, undesirable. Isn’t the contemporary idealisation of mixedness – the suggestion that we are more beautiful or have “the best of both” – simply the other side of the same coin?

No, it isn’t. Her own link is to this:

Geneticists in England and the United States clearly reversed their published remarks on the effects of race crossing between 1930 and 1950. The reversal occurred in two steps. First came the change in the 1930’s from a condemnation of wide race crosses to an agnostic view. The second change, from the agnostic view to the belief that wide race crosses were at worst biologically harmless, took place during and shortly after World War II.

It’s an investigation of why the attitude changed. The answer given being that we looked at the Nazis and their preoccupations with these sorts of things, had a think about that and then went and had a war which killed 50 million people to get rid of the vile and hateful ideas and the associated actions.

No Honey, this is neither the same nor the other side of the coin of admiring a phat booty these days.

Jeez, The Guardian will publish anything these days, won’t it? As long, I assume, as it is sufficiently narcissistic as they’re still not availing themselves of picking up my stuff again.

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Total
0
Shares
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arthur the Cat
Arthur the Cat
9 days ago

I was amused the other day by the Guardian publishing one of its regular “Amazon bad, don’t use Amazon” articles, only to be totally undermined by a comment pointing out that the Guardian’s entire digital infrastructure runs on Amazon Web Services.

Spike
Spike
9 days ago

Every slight that befalls this woman in the course of a transition from rural to urban life—and even the good stuff—is somehow a profound comment on her skin color! The only way this could be worse is if she were Michelle Obama.

PS—Geneticists did not change their views over revulsion at Naziism. They did so from realizing who was paying fod their “research” and what they wanted to hear.

jgh
jgh
9 days ago

Billboard and shop window advertising is as localist as you can get. Bird moves to the most ethnically mixed city in the UK and complains there’s adverts targetting and reflecting the most ethnically mixed population in the UK.

Phoenix44
Phoenix44
9 days ago

It’s just a way for her to talk about herself. Just another me, me, me article. Utterly solipsistic- these adverts didn’t exist until she came to London.

Jon Jermey
Jon Jermey
9 days ago

Most of the mixed-race people I know are stunningly good-looking. I assume they have other biological advantages as well. Francis Galton demonstrated long ago that averaging out extremes–which is what interracial couplings do–produces better-looking people. What we are doing today is remedying the enforced isolation of relatively small human populations over many thousands of years, and the subsequent inbreeding that–when carried to extremes–produced features like the Habsburg lip.

Attractive people are attractive. It’s nice to have the opportunity to find that out.

Snarkus
Snarkus
9 days ago

I think she is merely self-absorbed, not stupid. To use CS Lewis’ comment about “self appointed intellectuals” (my paraphrase) in Pilgrims Regress, she has not travelled. In short, never mixed with people and minds of different views. Bubble ignorance seems to be a new virtue.

Snarkus
Snarkus
9 days ago
Reply to  Snarkus

BTW, who is the tanned young white woman above ?

Michael van der Riet
Michael van der Riet
9 days ago

No POC ads means white supremacism. POC ads means white supremacism. The dear woke woman needs a wake up call.

Can you help support Continental Telegraph?

If you can spare a few pounds you can donate to our fundraising campaign below. All donations are greatly appreciated and go towards our server, security and software costs. 25,000 people per day read our sites and every penny goes towards our fight against the Establishment. We don't take a wage and do what we do because we enjoy it and hope our readers enjoy it too.


Donate
8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x